A 2-employee marketing firm bought a coffee stand — decided before hiring, and stayed closed for 5 months

It’s rare, in an M&A success-story interview, for a buyer to describe their own misjudgments in this much detail. Not doing due diligence. Consulting a lawyer too late. And buying before hiring staff to run the shop, resulting in the store staying closed for about 5 months. Mr. Koga, representative of Ansatz Inc., puts all of it into words. The transfer amount is undisclosed, but there’s more than enough material here to see how the order of decisions feeds back into performance.

The buyer and the target business

The interview was published in August 2024, and given that it discusses conditions “since the May reopening,” the acquisition appears to have taken place in December 2023 with reopening in May 2024. Neither the transfer amount nor the shop’s revenue scale has been disclosed. Koga himself has said, “revenue still isn’t at a size you could really call a business yet.”

Why a marketing company bought a coffee stand

Koga began his career at a digital marketing vendor, then after changing jobs experienced sales, inside sales, customer success, and business development broadly across the business side. As he passed 30, coinciding with the pandemic, he thought, “even if I fail, I’m still at an age where I can start over,” and founded Ansatz in 2021.

The motive for the acquisition has two layers. The surface reason: since some of the company’s marketing-support clients run local businesses, having his own experience running a physical shop would translate directly into a deeper understanding for his main business. The deeper reason sits in his management philosophy. “I felt that a startup-style approach aiming for rapid growth of a business or organization didn’t suit us.” Helping the people and companies around him solve their problems while continuing for as long as possible. That style, he felt, “resembles local businesses rooted in a community and loved for a long time.”

The deal’s conditions didn’t restrict by business type, but ran on two axes: room for improvement and low fixed costs. A coffee stand does carry rent, but since it was kept low, it became a candidate for consideration.

The deciding factor: “bought before hiring”

The turning point in this case came not at the acquisition closing itself but with the decision he made while not a single staff member had yet been secured.

The seller had staffed the shop themselves. Koga, with his main job, can’t stand on the floor. In other words, at the moment of succession, the structure was such that the number of people running the shop would drop to zero. Knowing this, he says, “I value deciding and moving fast, so with a sense of ‘it’ll probably work out somehow,’ I decided to buy before doing any hiring.”

The result showed up as a clear number. From the December purchase to the May reopening, the shop remained in a state of preparation the entire time, about 5 months of closure. He identifies the cause himself: “Since I’m not experienced in the food-service industry, I didn’t know what skill set to hire for to be able to entrust someone with running the shop, and that delayed my move into hiring.”

It’s worth separating what was lost from what wasn’t. What was lost: 5 months of revenue, plus rent that kept accruing the whole time. What wasn’t lost: the value of the business itself. Post-reopening revenue returned to roughly the level the seller had described during negotiations.

Why customers came back after a 5-month closure

Chalking up the revenue recovery to “good luck” alone would miss the lesson. The conditions that made the recovery possible break down into three parts.

The format had low substitutability. Being decaf-focused, it’s hard to imagine many comparable nearby options for customers who can’t have caffeine, people with a coffee allergy, people sensitive to caffeine, pregnant women. In a market with easy substitutes, a 5-month gap would send customers elsewhere for good. Being a niche worked in favor of closure resilience.

The taste, crucially, wasn’t changed. The menu largely carried over the seller’s recipes, with new items (like affogato and mango panna cotta juice) added as summer additions. During negotiations, Koga conveyed, “while carrying forward the intent, I want to operate based on what the seller built up,” and he did exactly that in practice. That customers kept coming back while noting, “oh, it’s open again” or “the staff changed” reflects that the shop’s identity was preserved.

Then the buyer added capability the seller hadn’t had. He revamped the website into content that made clear “what kind of shop this is” to anyone, replaced the photography with a proper shoot, and issued a press release that led to media coverage. This discoverability funnel is exactly what an independently run coffee stand is least likely to have, and it’s precisely the core competency of a digital marketing company. This is where the effect shows up from choosing an acquisition target in “an area where our own strength applies directly.”

And hiring was ultimately solved not through job boards but through a referral from a work acquaintance. When he mentioned he was about to start a coffee stand, he was introduced to a woman working part-time at a cafe. After confirming her own aspiration to “eventually have my own shop someday,” he hired her and handed over discretion along with the role, saying, “run it however you like.” She now runs the shop alone, with Koga stopping by about once a week. What shows up here is a structural point: making a small shop work without the owner on the floor requires delegating discretion rather than supervising.

What he cites as reflections

Koga says the negotiation itself went smoothly, but names two clear regrets. One is that his consultation with retained counsel came too late, forcing the contract drafting into a rush. The other is not doing due diligence. “Since the deal size wasn’t that large, I decided to buy without doing any particular due diligence, but I think I really should have gone through a proper process, checking the content of the assets carefully to judge whether the price was appropriate, and managing risk properly.”

The judgment that “it’s small so we don’t need to check” lowers the amount at risk but doesn’t lower the time at risk. In fact, what ended up costing the most in this deal was the 5-month gap, not the acquisition price.

What’s replicable, what isn’t

What’s replicable is the design thinking: filtering deals by low fixed costs, buying in an area where your company’s existing capabilities apply directly. And setting closeness in values with the seller as a condition. Koga has said, “I don’t think you should do an M&A where your own values and the seller’s are too far apart,” and points out that the smaller the deal amount, the more important it is to draw out what the seller cares about in the business and what they don’t want changed, and to reconcile that against your own thinking. And delegating discretion to a shop manager to make unattended operation work is also replicable.

What’s harder to replicate: first, finding a capable manager through a referral. This is an area Koga himself admits was a hiring failure, a place where luck played a large role. Next, being able to withstand 5 months without income was possible because the main digital marketing business was growing roughly 150% a year. If this single deal had been someone’s sole livelihood, the same decision wouldn’t have been possible. The Nihonbashi location and the decaf niche also aren’t guaranteed to be found just by searching. A subscription coffee-bean service raised as a future prospect also remains at an early stage, “there’s a lot to think through, like the terms and delivery setup, and we haven’t yet had time to give it proper thought.”

Related reading

• A kitchen car opened in 4 months — Actual startup costs and revenue for a small offline shop
• A rental-space business transferred for 7.5 million yen — What a low-fixed-cost offline business sold for