KRIT: A $1M/Year, 6-Person Dev Agency Gets Bought by a 4-Year Client
The dev agency KRIT started with $16,000 from a university accelerator, refocused on seed-to-Series-A security companies as clients, and grew to $1M/year in revenue. In June 2022 it was acquired by a four-year client, GreyNoise Intelligence.
Founded in 2014 with $16,000 from an accelerator at the University of South Carolina, the dev agency KRIT was acquired in June 2022 by GreyNoise Intelligence, a cybersecurity company that had been a long-time client. The sale price wasn’t disclosed, but co-founder Andrew Askins has described it as “enough for a down payment on a house, not enough to never work again.”
Dollar figures below are converted at roughly ¥150/$1. The actual amount varies with exchange rates and timing, so treat this as a rough sense of scale.
Eight years, in brief
| Time | Event / figures |
|---|---|
| 2014 | Founded with $16,000 from a University of South Carolina accelerator. Co-founders: Andrew Askins, Austin Price, Bill Brower |
| 2014–2017 | A generalist dev shop that “builds for anyone.” Differentiation was mostly on price alone |
| 2018 | Co-founder Brower leaves. Askins and Price continue as a two-person team |
| Around 2018 | After months of customer research and bringing in two consultants, they decide to narrow their target client base |
| Around 2018 | Work with GreyNoise Intelligence begins (a relationship that lasts 4 years, ending in acquisition) |
| 2021 | Annual revenue tips just over $1 million (~¥150 million) |
| Spring 2022 | GreyNoise makes an acquisition offer. Negotiations take about 3 months |
| June 2022 | Deal closes. All 6 team members join GreyNoise |
At the time of sale, the team was two co-founders plus four employees, six people total, supplemented by freelancers as needed. They typically had 4–6 concurrent clients, and their own website drew roughly 1,000–2,000 monthly visitors. $1 million in annual revenue divides to roughly $83,000/month, or about ¥12.5 million. Since agency revenue swings heavily month to month depending on how projects land, this figure is best read as an average.
What kind of company was it?
For roughly the first three years, KRIT was, in Askins’s own words, “a dev shop that builds for anyone.” Differentiation came mainly from being cheap, which made it hard to win higher-value work or speed up client acquisition, the classic position of a low-price subcontractor in an industry prone to exactly that race to the bottom.
From there, they re-carved their positioning along two axes: horizontally, “app development for non-technical founders,” and vertically, “cybersecurity startups from seed through Series A.” This wasn’t a snap decision. It followed months of customer research and deliberation with two hired consultants.
The moment things changed
The trajectory shifted right after that refocusing. Askins describes the effect: “It became easier to identify where we needed to be to connect with prospects, and they became more interested in talking to us. Suddenly, even cold email started working.”
That one sentence contains the entire mechanism of why narrowing works. As a generalist dev shop, you can’t define “where your prospects are.” If anyone could be a customer, there’s no way to decide which event to attend or which mailing list to join. The moment you define your target as “seed-to-Series-A security companies,” though, you can name, literally by name, which conferences to attend, which newsletters your prospects read, and which investors matter. Cold email didn’t start working because the copy got better. It started working because the recipient list became definable.
Much of the subsequent growth came through referrals from satisfied clients. In a narrow industry, referrals circulate within that same industry, so a track record compounds in persuasive power faster. Crossing $1 million in annual revenue in 2021 was the result of this cycle kicking in.
Where the buyer came from
The other turning point is that the buyer emerged not from the open market but from an existing client relationship. GreyNoise Intelligence had been a KRIT client for four years before proposing the acquisition. For a company looking to build out its engineering team, a six-person dev team that had spent four years hands-on with its product was a far more certain choice than hiring unknown candidates.
The step that normally consumes the most time and effort in a sale, the buyer verifying the seller’s capability, had in effect already been completed, over four years of working together. The roughly three-month timeline from the start of negotiations to close reflects that head start. The deal took the shape of an acqui-hire, and the founders themselves regarded it less as a pure exit and more as a change in employment status.
What wasn’t smooth
Behind a figure like “over $1M a year” lay a business that was far from healthy. Askins is blunt: “Revenue wasn’t predictable, and we weren’t making enough profit, which meant we couldn’t pay standout, competitive salaries.” Project inflow arrived in waves, so workload was unstable, and against the era’s rising engineer salaries, they couldn’t keep up on compensation. Even with consistently good marks for company culture, turnover continued because of the caps on pay and growth opportunity.
That thin margin fed straight back into the sale negotiation itself. Askins’s summary is unsparing: “The way to get the most leverage in an acquisition negotiation is to build a great business that you don’t want to sell and don’t need to sell. We weren’t profitable, and we wanted to be, so we gave up a lot of negotiating leverage.” “The more willing you are to walk away, the more leverage you have.”
He’s also candid about the toll of the sale process itself: “Selling a business is the worst,” and “one of the most stressful things I’ve done as a founder.” Even in a comparatively short three-month window, the business had to keep running normally without being able to tell employees or clients, and there were multiple moments where both sides nearly walked away.
How much of this is reproducible
The narrowing process is reproducible. Define your target along “industry × stage × customer attributes,” then work backward from that definition to figure out where to show up and who to list. Investing months of customer research and an outside perspective into this exercise is something any agency, at any scale, can undertake.
What’s hard to reproduce is where the buyer came from. The fact that four years of an existing client relationship became the foundation for the acquisition means, by definition, this isn’t something you can manufacture by deciding “I want to sell this year.” Whether an existing client can become a buyer depends on whether that client has capital and is heading toward wanting to bring the work in-house. It also mattered that the market they chose, seed-to-Series-A security companies, happened to be flush with funding at the time.
One more inconvenient truth this story surfaces: revenue scale and negotiating leverage are two different things. Even north of $1 million a year, if margins are thin and the founders want out, terms tilt toward the buyer. If you want a sale to be a real option, revenue is the wrong thing to grow. Profit, and a position where you’re not desperate to leave, are what count.
After the acquisition, Askins stayed on at GreyNoise for a time before leaving, took a break to walk the Camino de Santiago, and has since moved into fractional consulting and building an SEO-automation tool called MetaMonster.
Related reading
Sources
- Founder They Got Acquired
This article summarizes and analyzes the public sources above. Please refer to the primary sources for details.
You may freely quote or republish this article in news media, blogs, or AI answers, provided you credit "Small Start (small-start.com)" and link to this page. No prior permission is needed. Reprint & quotation policy →
Similar cases

Allobee: When Funding Dried Up in 2022, a $500K-Revenue Business Found Its Buyer Through One Mass Email to Its Network
Web service
Moonlight: 10,000 Engineers, $10,000/Month in Subscription Revenue — Choosing “Sell, Not Raise” in the Pandemic
Web service
One email, a reply 11 minutes later: how a marketing agency with $1.2M in revenue sold to Mighty Networks in 30 days
Other
Deep Research: $400 in Startup Capital, Price per Project From $700 to $6,000 — the Year It Changed What It Was Actually Selling
Web serviceMost read
- 1
Peing: Built in 6 Hours, 200M Monthly PV in One Month — Sold at the Breaking Point of Virality
13 recent visits - 2
Six AI videos, ¥153,030 in the first month — one video with 4.22 million views drove two-thirds of TikTok monetization revenue
11 recent visits - 3
Zenn: A Solo-Built Dev Community Transferred to Classmethod 4.5 Months After Launch
- 4
ScrapingBee: Two Failures, $5M ARR, an 8-Figure All-Cash Exit — the Complete “By-the-Book” Journey
- 5
MENTA, Shingo Irie's 30th Indie Project: From ¥1.4M Monthly Revenue to a Share Transfer to Lancers — the Full Story
Latest articles
- 2026年9月1日
CyberLeads: After 19 Failed Projects, a "Freshly Funded Companies" Lead List Built in 31 Days Now Makes $53.7K/Month — with a Free Newsletter as the Sales Engine
- 2026年9月1日
Sauna Ikitai: A Hobby Search Site Reaches ¥72.88M in Year-Two Revenue — Zero Employees and a ¥370/Month Subscription Capped at 10,000 Members
- 2026年8月31日
SEObot: An AI That Writes SEO Articles Hits $46K MRR and $1.8M Lifetime — the Numbers Come from a Public Stripe-Linked Dashboard
- 2026年8月31日
Feather: The "Write in Notion, Publish as a Blog" SaaS Sold for $250K Two Years In — the Buyer Was Tibo, Who Exited Tweet Hunter
- 2026年8月27日
GummySearch: The Reddit Research SaaS That Chose to Close While Profitable — Four Years Ended by a Commercial API License That Never Came